| |
|
by Helen
Irlen, M.A., M.F.C.C.
Most people assume that once classic vision problems are corrected or ruled
out, everyone perceives the world in the same way. We now know that perception
can be different for some.
Sue, a fifth-grade student from a professional family, is having trouble
in school. When given an assignment requiring reading, she daydreams,
talks with friends, and looks around the room . . . anything but read.
Sue also has trouble accurately copying work from the board and often
leaves out letters, words, and even sentences. She complains that words
don't stay still and that numbers disappear; sometimes she gets headaches.
She listens in class and raises her hand to answer questions but does
not do well on tests. Her teachers insist she could do better if she would
just try harder.
Dave is a college student who used to have trouble controlling his behavior
in school. At home, his parents didn't see the same behavioral problems
his teachers complained about. School staff thought he was hyperactive,
but that was medically ruled out. As an outlet, Dave got involved in sports.
As Dave sits in his college classroom under fluorescent lights, he feels
the same frustration and agitation he experienced in primary and secondary
school; he has difficulty listening and performing in class. Dave likes
to take his work home, where he prefers working under dim lighting.
Alex, 26 years old, is a high-functioning autistic. She avoids looking
directly at people and objects in her environment. She is easily agitated
and hesitates going down stairs or getting on escalators. She dislikes
bright sunlight and fluorescent lighting. In her own words, faces appear
to melt, images split, and parts disappear. Under fluorescent lights,
images in her field "race, bounce, and shake." She finds it
easier to focus on the glimmering sparkles she sees around her
sparkles not seen by others.
These actual cases represent many children and adults who may be suffering
from a specific type of perceptual problem called Scotopic Sensitivity/Irlen
Syndrome (SSS). It is estimated to affect up to 12% of the general population
and a much higher percentage of the dyslexic, learning-disabled, ADHD,
and autistic populations.
Neither the educational nor medical system has tests that identify this
problem. Because it often remains undetected, those affected with it are
frequently thought of as lazy and unmotivated or are mislabeled as having
attention deficit or a learning disability.
Children and adults with SSS perceive the printed page or their surroundings
in a distorted fashion. They must continually make adaptations or compensation,
and may be unaware of the extra energy and effort they are putting into
perceiving. In mild cases, the perceptual distortions and overload might
simply inhibit the use of visual skills for sustained periods. But when
perceptual problems are severe, the distortions can interfere with reading
skills. In addition, SSS can underlie the serious sensory overload experienced
by some autistic individuals.
In the early 1980's, research with learning-disabled adults disclosed
a visual-perceptual processing deficit caused by light sensitivity. This
subgroup has a problem in the timing by which the brain receives and processes
visual information. This timing difficulty can cause distortions of print
and of the environment. Altering the timing permits the visual information
to be more accurately received and processed. We have found that a patented
treatment method using colored overlays and colored filters worn as glasses
can help correct this timing for many people.
Symptoms of Scotopic
Sensitivity/Irlen Syndrome
Light Sensitivity Discomfort or difficulty
concentrating in fluorescent lighting, sunlight, bright lights, glare,
and even lights at night
Poor Depth Perception Inability to
accurately judge distance or spatial relationships affecting small and
gross motor performance
Eyestrain Physical symptoms are varied
and include, but are not limited to, fatigue, drowsiness, headaches, fidgeting,
distractibility, and hyperactivity
Attention Deficit Disorders Problems
concentrating during tasks such as reading, computer use, and simply listening
and observing
Contrast and Color Sensitivity Problems
with high contrast, such as black on white, bright colors, and busy patterns,
such as stripes and polka dots
Restricted Span Inability to read
words in groups or see groups of objects in the environment together
Inefficient Reading Problems with
tracking, skipping words, skipping lines, rereading for information, and
slow reading rate
Distortions Reports
of images, backgrounds, and/or print moving, fading, disappearing, swirling,
sparkling, or shimmering.
Research
Over the past ten years, 27 independent research studies
have raised the possibility that inadequate visual processing may be a
factor in reading disabilities. The research confirms that this deficit
can lead to problems with word recognition, fluency, accuracy, and comprehension.
Researchers have reported that individuals do experience perceptual distortions
and a restricted span of recognition.
|
Examples of perceptual problems
that can sometimes be helped by Irlen Lenses or Overlays |
| Rivers |
 |
| Seesaws |
 |
| Washout |
 |
In 1983, research into Scotopic Sensitivity/Irlen Syndrome was extended to
find a method for minimizing perceptual distortions. It was found that
individually tinted lenses (regular or corrective) could filter out those
frequencies of the light spectrum to which the individual may be uniquely
sensitive. It has been suggested that those with this disorder may have
sensory register images that persist longer than those of the average
reader, thus interfering with subsequent incoming printed stimuli or images.
This effect has been described as a deficit in the transient visual system.
Other researchers have concluded that colored filters might remove some
of the medium- to high- frequency spatial information, thus restoring
the relationship between the transient and sustained systems.
Irlen Colored Filters and Reading
A large number of studies have investigated the effect
of colored filtering on reading achievement. While these studies have
produced far more positive than negative results, findings vary. This
is not uncommon with a new technique, and more effort is needed to account
for a wide range of variables that can affect study results. The existing
level of word attack skills, student motivation, cognitive ability, possible
auditory problems or language deficits, and availability of remedial support
can all influence an individual's progress. Improved stability and visibility
of the print and/or background may make reading easier, but it will not,
by itself, teach reading skills to those who have not acquired them, nor
can it compensate for other factors that may be negatively affecting the
reading process.
Reading achievement by colored-filter users has been subject to long-term
analysis. In one of several studies, of 225 subjects who had worn Irlen
filters for 13 months, 57% indicated the filters were of great help, 36%
some help, and 7% no help. The analysis was repeated after six years of
wearing Irlen filters with similar results. Analysis has been done on
the positive effect of colored filters on eye movements while reading,
on visual search tasks and binocular coordination, and on reduced eyestrain
from fluorescent lighting.
Conclusion
While many positive studies have been done on the
use of colored filters, the contrary findings in some investigations may
be a reflection of the fact that SSS is only one of many possible causal
factors in reading achievement.
Improvement in visibility and stability of the print and/or background
may make doing visual tasks like reading easier, more comfortable, and
more efficient. But it will not allow an individual to overcome auditory
processing deficits that affect reading, it will not compensate for an
attention deficit disorder, and it will not overcome language processing
deficits. It will not remediate other vision problems, alter brain dysfunctions
not directly associated with SSS, or raise levels of intelligence. Clearly,
many physiological not to mention motivational, educational, and
cultural factors affect the acquisition of reading skills.
The discovery of SSS and treatment with colored filters specific to the
individual provides us with another valuable tool to use when investigating
problems of reading, learning, behavior, depth perception, and attention.
Seventy-five Irlen Clinics are located worldwide in
the following countries: United States, Canada, Republic of Ireland, England,
Iceland, New Zealand, Australia, Hong Kong, Jordan, South Africa, and
Belgium. Thousands of professionals in the United States have been trained
in the Irlen Method and are able to screen and identify individuals with
this type of perceptual problem. In addition, over 2,000 school districts
in the U.S. use the Irlen Method to screen children who are having academic
difficulties and provide them with colored paper for writing and colored
overlays to use over reading material.
For more information regarding training, the location
of Irlen Clinics,
or a complete list of the studies referred to in this article, contact
the Irlen Institute, 5380 Village Road, Long Beach, CA 90808.
phone: 562.496.2550; fax: 562.429.8699;
email:

Reprinted from
Latitudes,
vol. 2, no. 5; published by ACN.
Copyright ©2007 Association for Comprehensive NeuroTherapy. All Rights
Reserved.
Latitudes is a quarterly online publication of the
Association for Comprehensive NeuroTherapy (ACN). Every issue has information on
non-toxic approaches to autism, depression, obsessive compulsive disorder and
anxiety, Tourette syndrome, learning disabilities and attention deficit
disorder/hyperactivity. Subscription: $40. To order online
click here.
Or, fax address and credit card information to (561) 798-9820; checks can be
made payable to ACN and sent to Latitudes Subscriptions, P.O. Box 2198, Broken Arrow, OK 74013.
|